Slow essays on AI & health, research, strategy, ethics, tools, and the future. Calm, evidence-based, premium. No newsletter spam.
Featured
Stripe, Anthropic and the OpenAI Foundation are putting half a billion dollars behind a nonprofit to end the common cold. It’s real, it’s not hype, and it tells you exactly how AI is arriving in health: from the top, through capital and protein design and the air in your office — not through another app on your phone. Which is precisely why the part you control matters more, not less.
Ethics
5 essays
Two big documents landed on health-AI this year: a WHO readiness report and the EU’s AI Act starting to bite. Between them they hand back a question most people have been outsourcing: who is accountable when a chat tool helps you decide something about your own body. This is what changes for a careful individual, and what changes for a solo practitioner.
The decision to lean on an AI for something tender almost never gets made on purpose. It happens at midnight, mid-spiral, with a tool that is fluent, patient and infinitely agreeable — three qualities that feel like care and aren’t. This is the pre-flight: seven questions to run before you trust an AI with your mental health, so the choice is one you made rather than one that happened to you. None of them takes longer than the spiral already will.
Your heart rate, your sleep stages, your cycle, your glucose, your voice, soon your gait and your face — the most intimate dataset that has ever existed is being assembled, and almost none of it is held by you. AI makes that data dramatically more valuable and dramatically easier to read, which raises a question the terms-of-service skip past: who actually owns the record of your own body? Here’s a clear-eyed look at biodata ownership in the AI era — and the practical, unglamorous way to take your copy back.
AI is not the enemy. Surrendered agency is. A ten-point reading of Pope Leo's Magnifica Humanitas, translated out of theology and into the only thing that matters for your health: who is allowed to read your body, and who decides what happens next.
Where the AI Health Stack ends, and where a human practitioner has to begin.
New essays roughly once a fortnight. Subscribe in the footer for the Sunday letter.
Editorial principles
Every claim ranks itself: strong, promising, anecdotal. We label it. We don't hide it.
If we can't explain why something works, we don't recommend it. Even when it's trending.
One essay a fortnight, written until it's right. No publishing calendar pressure.
Templates and prompts are yours to copy, fork, modify. We benefit when you build, not when you stay.
No countdown timers, no 'last chance' subject lines. The Sunday letter arrives Sunday.
When something we recommended doesn't hold up, we publish the retraction at the top of the original.
The Sunday Letter
The week's essay, plus three signal-over-noise links from what we read. No tracking pixels. No re-engagement campaigns. Unsubscribe in one click.
Same list as the footer signup. One-click unsubscribe in every email. EU-built, GDPR-first.
Related
Pick the door that matches where you are. The Atlas points you at tools, the courses teach the method, the case studies show the work.
100+ AI tools sorted by what they actually do for your health stack — research, ledger, protocol. Updated quarterly.
Get the AtlasBi-weekly Zoom workshop with Sabin. Build your AI Health Stack end-to-end, ask one real question, leave with a working setup.
Reserve a seatBuild your own AI Health Stack in 4 weeks. Same method we use with private clients — Research, Ledger, Protocol.
See the coursesPersonalised
Based on what you've been reading — always learning.